TIPSLIFEHACKS

Auckland dentist Bharath Subramani, already facing scrutiny for multiple prior investigations, is once again under the spotlight following a recent inquiry by the Health and Disability Commissioner (HDC). This latest investigation has uncovered further breaches of patient rights, adding to a concerning pattern of errors and substandard care. The findings highlight significant concerns about Subramani’s practice and its impact on vulnerable patients.

The most recent case centres around a particularly egregious error: Subramani placed a crown on the wrong tooth. While the dentist has since apologized for this mistake, the HDC’s investigation revealed a broader range of issues, demonstrating a systemic failure to meet expected standards of care. The apology, while welcomed by the HDC, doesn't erase the harm caused to the patient or address the underlying issues that allowed such errors to occur.

A History of Concerns

Subramani’s practice has been the subject of repeated investigations and complaints. Previous findings have included concerns about inadequate pain management, misdiagnosis, and poor communication with patients. This latest breach further reinforces the impression of a dentist struggling to maintain a safe and ethical practice. The recurring nature of these issues raises serious questions about the oversight of his practice and the measures taken to protect patients.

Impact on Patients and the Public

The HDC’s role is to investigate complaints about health and disability services and to advocate for patients’ rights. This latest investigation serves as a stark reminder of the importance of rigorous quality control within the healthcare system. The consequences of such errors extend beyond the individual patient; they erode public trust in the dental profession and raise concerns about the safety of healthcare services in general.

What Happens Next?

The HDC’s report outlines a series of recommendations aimed at addressing the identified breaches and preventing future incidents. These recommendations likely include requirements for further training, supervision, and potentially restrictions on Subramani’s practice. The Dental Council will also be reviewing the HDC’s findings and considering disciplinary action, which could include suspension or cancellation of his registration. Patients who have concerns about their care provided by Subramani are encouraged to contact the HDC or the Dental Council to lodge a complaint.

This case underscores the critical need for ongoing vigilance and accountability within the healthcare sector to ensure the safety and wellbeing of all New Zealanders. The HDC continues to play a vital role in holding healthcare providers accountable and advocating for patient rights, safeguarding the public from preventable harm.